![]() In fact, in later medieval astrology it was common to look at which planet had testimony over multiple points in order to judge the “winner” for a specific topic. You can also have winners over many points. For instance, to examine the Lot of Fortune, we could look at the dignity scores of each of its rulers to determine which planet is the most important one to analyze in relation to the lot. ![]() The testimony we are referring to is in regards to the matter signified by the specified position. However, the planet with the most testimony says the most important things. In other words, all the rulers have some testimony, i.e. ![]() This winner planet is judged to have the most significant “testimony” among all the planets with “testimony”. Sometimes the winner is called the almuten or al-mubtazz (again from words meaning winner). The ruler with the most points is the “winner”. In the typical dignity pointing system, rulers of a position are assigned points in a weighted fashion. One of the most ubiquitous aspects of late traditional astrology is the use of a dignity pointing system. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |